by Adam Johnson | Nov 2, 2026 | Article, Democratic Party, Media Criticism, midterms, Opinion, Politics and Movements: US
You may have heard that Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed is “having a lot of trouble putting [the Democratic] coalition back together,” or that “Democrats [are] struggling to unite behind El-Sayed,” or that “Democrats are still struggling to unite behind El-Sayed,” or that “El-Sayed faces resistance from some voters who would ordinarily be inclined to support a Democrat,” or that “Democratic divisions could hurt El-Sayed.” It’s a prominent narrative that is driving political discourse in the closing weeks of the tight Michigan Senate race.
There’s only one problem with this narrative: It has zero empirical basis. It’s a total confection of US media and the pro-Israel lobby that isn’t supported by any data whatsoever. Two recent polls, one from Marist and one from RedBox Research, make it clear that El-Sayed’s support among Democratic voters in Michigan is both extremely high (95%) and the exact same percentage as Republican candidate Mike Rogers’ support with Republicans. And a new poll from Mitchell Research CBS complicates the narrative even further, finding that support for El-Sayed among Democrats is, in fact, 3 points higher than Rogers is among Republicans, at 94% versus 91%, respectively.
If El-Sayed and Rogers have the exact same percent of party dissent—or, as is the case in the CBS Detroit poll, Rogers has more—then why are there countless stories highlighting, handwringing, and scandalizing the trivially small dissent for only one of the candidates? Where are the breathless profiles of Republicans refusing to vote for Rogers? Where are the NPR and CNN segments focusing on “Republican divisions”?
There, of course, aren’t any, because this narrative wouldn’t advance an ideological agenda.
The “Michigan Democrats are
by Julia Conley | Oct 6, 2026 | Article, California, Iran, Politics and Movements: International, Politics and Movements: US, Reprint, Trump
This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Oct. 06, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.
“Keep our city out of your reckless war talk,” said San Diego’s mayor, Todd Gloria, Monday night after President Donald Trump’s rambling speech at a rally in Nebraska included a particularly violent mention of the California city.
Gloria was among several Democratic political leaders who were incensed after Trump—moments after predicted the Republican Party would see a “tremendous victory” in the November 3 midterm elections—suggested that he would not object to an Iranian military or nuclear attack on San Diego and Los Angeles.
The president said that soaring prices for gas, groceries, and other essentials are a “small price to pay for keeping the world safe—keeping our country safe.”
Trump on Iran: Let ’em take out Los Angeles and San Diego, it’s a small price to pay pic.twitter.com/Fc4BcjVDKj— Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) October 6, 2026
He warned that Iran could “take out a city,” before adding that he would “let them” attack the two deep-blue cities—home to a collective 5.2 million people, with more than 20 million residents in the surrounding areas
“Let them take out Los Angeles. Let them take out San Diego,” Trump said at the rally in Grand Island. “This is a very small price to pay… It’s gonna be over very soon.”
The crowd responded to Trump’s comments with laughter and cheers. The president has frequently made Democratic strongholds like Los Angeles, Chicago, and his own hometown of New York City the targets of rhetorical attacks. He has also targeted those cities with the deployment of armed federal agents as part of his mass
by TRNN | Oct 5, 2026 | Article, Press Release, Press Releases, Uncategorized
#trnn-pd{–y:#F6BF00;–k:#111;max-width:860px;margin:0 auto;background:#fff;color:#1a1a1a;font-family:’Source Serif 4′,Georgia,’Times New Roman’,serif;font-size:19px;line-height:1.6;-webkit-font-smoothing:antialiased}
#trnn-pd *{box-sizing:border-box}
#trnn-pd .pd-hero{background:var(–k);padding:36px 44px 40px}
#trnn-pd .pd-logos{display:flex;justify-content:space-between;align-items:center;gap:20px;padding-bottom:24px;border-bottom:1px solid #3a3a3a}
#trnn-pd .pd-logos img{display:block;width:auto;margin:0;max-width:none}
#trnn-pd .pd-logos .pd{height:68px}#trnn-pd .pd-logos .tr{height:54px}
#trnn-pd .pd-tag{display:inline-block;margin:28px 0;background:var(–y);color:#111;font:800 13px/1 Archivo,Arial,sans-serif;letter-spacing:.16em;padding:8px 14px}
#trnn-pd h2.pd-title{font:800 clamp(28px,4.6vw,42px)/1.1 Archivo,Arial,sans-serif;color:#fff;margin:18px 0;padding:0;text-transform:none;letter-spacing:0}
#trnn-pd .pd-dek{font:italic 400 clamp(18px,2.3vw,21px)/1.45 ‘Source Serif 4’,Georgia,serif;color:#e6e6e6;margin:18px 0}
#trnn-pd .pd-callout{background:var(–y);padding:22px 44px;font:800 clamp(19px,2.8vw,26px)/1.25 Archivo,Arial,sans-serif;color:#111;margin:0}
#trnn-pd .pd-main{padding:40px 44px 44px}
#trnn-pd .pd-main p{margin:0 22px;font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit;color:inherit}
#trnn-pd a{color:#111;text-decoration:underline;text-decoration-color:var(–y);text-decoration-thickness:3px;text-underline-offset:3px;transition:background .15s}
#trnn-pd a:hover{background:var(–y);color:#111}
#trnn-pd .pd-main p.pd-quote{background:#FFF4CC;border-left:6px solid var(–y);padding:22px 26px;font-style:italic;font-size:1.06em;margin:30px 0}
#trnn-pd .pd-main p.pd-proj{background:var(–k);color:#fff;font:700 clamp(17px,2.2vw,20px)/1.4 Archivo,Arial,sans-serif;padding:20px 26px;margin:30px 0}
#trnn-pd .pd-foot{background:var(–k);color:#e8e8e8;padding:34px 44px 38px;border-top:6px solid var(–y);display:flex;gap:48px;flex-wrap:wrap}
#trnn-pd .pd-about{flex:1.5 1 320px}#trnn-pd .pd-contact{flex:1 1 240px}
#trnn-pd .pd-foot h3{font:800 15px/1.3 Archivo,Arial,sans-serif;letter-spacing:.03em;text-transform:none;color:var(–y);margin:0 12px;padding:0}
#trnn-pd .pd-foot p{margin:0;font-size:16px;line-height:1.6;color:#e8e8e8}
#trnn-pd .pd-foot .pd-name{display:block;font:700 17px/1.3 Archivo,Arial,sans-serif;color:#fff;margin:14px 2px}
#trnn-pd .pd-foot a{color:#fff;text-decoration-color:var(–y)}
#trnn-pd .pd-foot a:hover{color:#111}
@media (max-width:600px){#trnn-pd{font-size:17px}#trnn-pd .pd-hero{padding:24px 22px 28px}#trnn-pd .pd-main{padding:28px 22px 32px}#trnn-pd .pd-callout{padding:18px 22px}#trnn-pd .pd-foot{padding:28px 22px 32px;gap:28px}#trnn-pd .pd-logos{flex-direction:column;align-items:flex-start;gap:18px}#trnn-pd .pd-logos .pd{height:52px}#trnn-pd .pd-logos .tr{height:42px}#trnn-pd .pd-main p.pd-quote,#trnn-pd .pd-main p.pd-proj{padding:18px 18px}}
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
The Real News Network launches English-language Brazilian reporting project ahead of pivotal election
Panamerican Dispatch is a new journalism project created in September 2026 to produce and distribute news and analysis from Latin America, within the United States.
Brazilians are heading to the polls. The stakes for the region could not be higher.
U.S. President Donald Trump has renewed attention on Latin America as not seen in decades. There are major concerns for the future of democracy across Latin America and the legitimacy of upcoming elections in the region.
That is why Panamerican Dispatch is needed today.
“Panamerican Dispatch is an essential site to learn about Latin American events from perspectives that go beyond the talking heads of mainstream media venues,” said Rafael Ioris, a Brazilian Latin American history professor at the University of Denver. “This is even more valuable in today’s changing and concerning landscape of the Western hemisphere.”
Most of the content
by Yuri Ferreira | Oct 5, 2026 | Article, bolsonaro, brazil, elections, Politics and Movements: International, Reprint
This story originally appeared in Panamerican Dispatch on Oct. 05, 2026, and is shared here with permission.
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva spoke on Sunday, after the release of the results of the first round of the 2026 elections. He said his campaign for a second round of the presidential race begins this Monday, October 5.
Lula will face Senator Flávio Bolsonaro in the runoff, scheduled for October 25.
In his speech, Lula stated that he intends to present to voters the differences between the two candidates’ platforms.
“Starting tomorrow, we begin a new campaign,” he said. “We will be able to show the difference between the proposals that exist for Brazil. The Brazilian people will have no doubt about choosing who will win the election.”
Lula also launched direct attacks on Flávio Bolsonaro’s political track record and cited the candidate’s past.
“He has a dark history,” Lula said. “With dark connections, with extremely serious suspicions, with ties to militia members and organized crime. All of this will become clear.”
The president mentioned Banco Master. He claimed that Flávio had a hand in the institution’s creation.
“Banco Master resulted in the greatest corruption scandal in this country and the biggest free-for-all involving politicians,” he said.
The accusations raised by Lula are part of his runoff campaign rhetoric and are expected to be a key point of contention between the two candidates in the coming weeks.
The president also argued that the race should be framed as a choice over the country’s future. He stated that his candidacy represents an opportunity to drive change in the Brazilian economy.
“We will show what has been done and what society expects to be
by Brad Reed | Oct 2, 2026 | Article, elections, midterms, Politics and Movements: US, Reprint, Voting Rights
This story originally appeared in Common Dreams on Oct. 02, 2026. It is shared here under a Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0) license.
An analysis published Friday by Democracy Docket warned that “tens of thousands” of voters across the US face “risk of disenfranchisement” thanks to actions being taken by the United States Postal Service.
The analysis, written by veteran election reporter Jim Saksa, points to a new USPS policy known as Regional Transportation Optimization (RTO) that “will eliminate evening mail pickups from post offices more than 50 miles away from a regional processing facility, most of which are located in major urban areas.”
For people who live in these areas, ballots sent on Election Day will be postmarked and delivered at least a day later than in previous election years, thus making it ineligible to be included in final election tallies.
“In every state, a day’s delay in delivery means that if mail voters wait until the last day or two before the election to mail their ballot,” Saksa explained, “they could be disenfranchised.”
Saksa reported that this policy is currently active in “about 42.5% of all ZIP codes” in the continental US, and is scheduled to eventually take effect in around 70% of all ZIP codes. No additional ZIP codes are expected to be added between now and election day.
Saksa also said that voters concerned about their ballots not being counted should deliver them in person to their local post office, where they can ask an employee to postmark it.
President Donald Trump has tried for the last several months to use USPS to meddle with states’ mail-in voting systems.
In March, the president signed an executive
by Ali Harb | Oct 2, 2026 | Article, Gaza, ICE, Israel, Palestine, Politics and Movements: International, Politics and Movements: US, Prisons and Policing, Reprint
Florida lawyer Jalal Shehadeh is convinced that the warrantless seizure of his cell phone by federal agents at the Newark International Airport after he returned from Palestine this September was not random.
Shehadeh, a Miami-based attorney and Palestinian rights advocate, was held for several hours for a secondary inspection and had his phone seized by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) after he refused to allow federal agents to search it.
“It’s just a wildly invasive thing to do to somebody with no individualized justifiable basis to do it,” Shehadeh told Truthout.
He suspects federal authorities targeted him for his activism. The lawyer is involved in a legal complaint against a federal judge in Florida over the judge’s anti-Palestinian statements.
Shehadeh is one of several Palestinian rights advocates who have been detained and had their personal devices searched by CBP while returning to the U.S. from international travel since the start of Israel’s war on Gaza in October 2023.
Other similar cases include Amir Makled, a lawyer from the Detroit area who was representing University of Michigan students involved in pro-Palestine activism, journalist Max Blumenthal, and Osama Abu Irshaid, the executive director of American Muslims for Palestine (AMP).
Jenin Younes, president of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), which filed a legal motion earlier this week demanding the return of Shehadeh’s phone, said CBP appears to be escalating phone searches against opponents of President Donald Trump’s agenda.
“Common sense tells us that they are targeting people who have pro-Palestine views,” Younes told Truthout.
She stressed that the searches are illegal. The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects “persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.”
Younes said
