‘The Alabama Department of Corrections is a drug cartel’

‘The Alabama Department of Corrections is a drug cartel’

The Alabama prison system functions like a modern-day plantation: overcrowded, understaffed prisons like Bullock Correctional Facility run on forced labor, violence, and deliberate neglect. In this episode of Rattling the Bars, host Mansa Musa speaks with journalist Matthew Vernon Whalan about his book Bullock: Chronicles of Deprivation and Despair in an American Prison, and about the systematic corruption and inhumane horrors endured daily by incarcerated people in Alabama.

Guest:

Matthew Vernon Whalan is a writer and oral historian living in New England. He is the author of the book Bullock: Chronicles of Deprivation and Despair in an American Prison, and his work has appeared in Counterpunch Magazine, Alabama Political Reporter, Scheer Post, Jacobin, Eunoia Review, New York Journal of Books, The Brattleboro Reformer, and elsewhere. He runs the publication Hard Times Reviewer.

Credits:

Producer / Videographer / Post-Production: Cameron Granadino

Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

Mansa Musa:

Welcome to this edition of Rattling Bars. I’m your host, Mansa Musa. In this country, we have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness according to the Constitution. But in this country also, we have legalized slavery under the 13th Amendment. To understand what legalized slavery is, institutionalized slavery is, all you have to do is look to Alabama and the Alabama prison system. The prison industrial complex in Alabama is one of the most notorious systems in this country, I would even venture to say in the world. Join me today is Matthew Whalan. Matthew wrote a book called Bullock: Chronicles of Deprivation and Despair in an American Prison. Thank you for joining us today, Matthew.

Matthew Whalan:

Thank you for having me.

Mansa Musa:

Alright,

Original

Inside the modern-day plantation: How theater confronts incarceration

Inside the modern-day plantation: How theater confronts incarceration

Rattling the Bars host Mansa Musa explores how a one-woman play, The Peculiar Patriot, reveals the human cost of mass incarceration and the enduring ties between slavery and the prison system. The artist behind the play, Liza Jessie Peterson, has worked with incarcerated youth for decades, bringing their stories to the stage and to national audiences. Performed in more than 35 US prisons and filmed at Louisiana’s Angola Prison—once a plantation, now a maximum-security facility—the play became the basis of the documentary, Angola: Do You Hear Us? (Paramount Plus / Amazon Prime). As the fight for abolition and prison reform gains momentum, this story reminds us that art is not decoration—it’s a tool for awakening, organizing, and freedom.

Producer / Videographer / Post-Production: Cameron Granadino

Transcript
Mansa Musa: Welcome to this edition of Rattling the Bars. I’m your host, Mansa Musa. In African tradition, we have what is known as the griot. The griot is a storyteller, but more importantly, the griot is one that translate our oral history into telling events, activities, and monumental accomplishments of African people. Today we have a griot, but more importantly, we have a revolutionary griot. We have a woman that has been inspired to take and tell the stories of African people that’s under the 13th Amendment, but more importantly to educate people about the humanity of these people that we call prisoners and to give them a space so their voices can be heard and the value can be turned up. Liza Jessie Peterson is an activist and actress, playwright, poet, author, and youth advocate who has worked steadfast with incarcerated populations for more than two decades. Her

Original

Why more mega-prisons won’t fix Alabama’s crisis

Why more mega-prisons won’t fix Alabama’s crisis

From chronic overcrowding and inmate deaths to systematic abuse and lawbreaking by corrections officers, prison conditions in the state of Alabama have reached a crisis point. And yet, state leaders continue to push an “Alabama solution” that involves building more mega-prisons and expanding qualified immunity for officers. In this episode of Rattling the Bars, host Mansa Musa speaks with Dakarai Larriett, a Democratic candidate for US Senate in Alabama, about about the true cost of Alabama’s carceral crisis and his vision for an alternative vision of criminal justice.

Guest:

Dakarai Larriett is a community leader, entrepreneur, and Democratic candidate for US Senate in Alabama

Credits:

Producer / Videographer / Post-Production: Cameron Granadino

Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

Mansa Musa:

Welcome to this edition of Rattling the Bars. I’m your host Mansa Musa. We’ve been hitting hard on covering what’s going on down in Sweet Home, Alabama. We’ve been intentional about giving people a voice or turn the volume up on their voice about what they should be done in Alabama. What is the Alabama solution? This term came out of a documentary where prison system in Alabama was being highlighted, and when they confronted the governor with some of the realities of the abuse that was taking place in the Alabama prison system in general, and the fact that the United States Attorney General had issued a mandate that the conditions in Alabama were so horrendous that they had to do something about it, the governor respond was this is not a Justice Department solution. This is not the Justice Department responsible correcting.

Original

Rural America wants to break its economic addiction to prisons

Rural America wants to break its economic addiction to prisons

Prisons have frequently been presented as a “solution” to the economic woes and employment needs of rural communities around the US—but that doesn’t mean residents of these communities want them there. In Franklin County, Arkansas, for instance, residents are banding together in opposition to the state’s plans to build a mega-prison in their area. In this episode of Rattling the Bars, host Mansa Musa speaks with Lauren Gill, a staff reporter from Bolts magazine, and Natalie Cadena, executive director of the Arkansas-based rural advocacy nonprofit Gravel & Grit, about the fight in Franklin County and rural America’s changing relationship to the prison-industrial complex.

Guests:

Lauren Gill is a staff writer at Bolts. She previously worked as a reporter for The Appeal, Newsweek, and the Brooklyn Paper. Her reporting on the criminal legal system has also appeared in ProPublica, Rolling Stone, The Intercept, Slate, The Nation, and The Marshall Project, among others.

Natalie Cadena is a seasoned education professional and writer with over 13 years in public education and 15 years of experience in professional writing. She is also the executive director of Gravel & Grit, a 501(c)(4) nonprofit dedicated to transparency, accountability, and rural advocacy in the state of Arkansas.

Additional links/info:

Gravel & Grit website and Instagram

Lauren Gill, Bolts, “The prison next door”

Caroline McCoy, Oxford American, “Arkansas’s faulty plan to build a mega prison”

Credits:

Producer / Videographer / Post-Production: Cameron Granadino

Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

Mansa Musa:

Welcome to this edition of Rattling the Bars. I’m your host, Mansa Musa.

When we think about prisons and we think about prisons in rural America, the first thing most people think is that the rural community wants the prison, it’s the number one source of the economy for the prison. I even had this thought all the time, I even repeated that, that yeah, in rural America, prison’snumber one industry — And in most cases it is. But I also thought that the people in these communities wanted these prisons, that they were like, yeah, we want this, this is recession proof. As long as we got people locked up, we got jobs.

But this is not the case.

Today we’re talking about a new proposed mega prison in Arkansas, a project that has drawn widespread local opposition, even in one of the state’s most conservative areas. Reporter Lauren Gill writes about it in her recent Bolts magazine article, “The Prison Next Door.” She details how the plan for a massive new correctional facility has shaken the small rural community of Franklin County.

To give you a sense of the scale, Franklin County has about 2,600 residents; The proposed prison would house 3,000 people. That’s more prisoners than locals.

Joining me today are Lauren Gill, who wrote the article, and Natalie Cadena, the executive director ofGravel and Grit, a local organization leading the fight to stop this project.

Lauren and Natalie, welcome to Rattling the Bars.

Natalie Cadena:

Thank you for having me.

Lauren Gill:

Thanks so much.

Mansa Musa:

Alright, so let’s start with why the opposition, OK? Give our audience a sense of why the residents inFranklin County is in opposition to this.

Lauren Gill:

Yeah, so I think this is a story about so many different things. So, first of all, you have the state ofArkansas that went to great lengths to hide this prison project that they wanted to bring to Franklin County. And this went on for years where they were searching secretly for land in the northwestern part of the state. And then finally, in July of 2024, they find this land in Franklin County. And state staff aresending emails about it. Some people are saying, oh, this isn’t land that will be viable because of just, it’sso hard to access. And you have state staff who are sending emails like, oh, should we come up with acode name for the project? So, that really gives an indication of the lengths that they were going throughto keep this hidden from the people of Franklin County until it was finally announced on Halloween in 2024.

So, it’s a story about how people are worried about their resources, they’re worried about their way of life,but they’re also worried about how the state is spending taxpayer money and what they say is veryirresponsibly because when the project was first announced, everybody knew that Sarah HuckabeeSanders wanted to build a new prison because that was something tough on crime, was something that shereally campaigned for during her election campaign. And she, shortly after going to office, she passes thisact called the Protect Arkansas Act, which virtually ensures that there’s going to be more need for aprison, another prison by limiting parole and making sure people are behind bars for longer. So yeah, shewas going to build this prison and it was supposed to be 470 million at the outset. And I think the numberis changing as the state is struggling to find just basic resources like water to supply the site.

And right now, I think they’re talking at over a billion dollars. So it’s just really ballooned. And I thinkthere are just so many different reasons that have just emerged throughout this whole entire process thatpeople in Franklin County are noticing and they’re thinking about more. And one of them as well is what Iwas really struck by when I was down there is I’m talking to people and 75% of the county had voted forSarah Huckabee Sanders. And I have people who are telling me, I never really thought aboutincarceration before. I never thought about prisons. And they said, well, once this prison was beingbrought to our community, I did some research and I’m finding out more about how incarceration worksin Arkansas, but I’m really starting to question just the way that the state locks so many people up.

Mansa Musa:

I was reading the article and it talked about the abolition of parole and it talked about some of the crimesthat would deny you parole. And some of the crimes is like don’t even murder, not giving people parole.But like you say, to your point, they need the body. So you change the laws to ensure that you’re going tohave body. Natalie, tell us about your organization, gravel and GR and how it formed, and what are someof the organizing efforts you all have been leading to stop this particular mega prison from being built?

Natalie Cadena:

Well, thank you again for having me on. So Gravel and Grit officially formed in February of 2025, but themembers of the group have been involved since day one. The announcement was made on Halloween andon November 7th, the local community in Charleston had called the Town Hall and they were justdemanding answers from the governor. It was announced on local radio out of the blue like Here, we’redoing you a favor, here’s a mega prison and you’re going to like it. So immediately there was a responseand there was a group of people that formed an official board called the Franklin County and River ValleyAssociation, and they are still active in this process. But as we went on throughout learning about how toaddress this issue in a way that’s going to get attention and really stand out because it’s hard to getattention of your legislature if you’re not allowed.

So they had a legal angle they wanted to pursue. In that part of it, we felt like fundraising was probablygoing to be something we would need to do. So we established a nonprofit, and that’s gravel and griditself is intended to be an advocate for rural communities going forward, not just with prisons, but thereare other communities in Arkansas, especially in the Delta region, but there are other communities inArkansas that need a voice and they’re not being heard by their government either, and they have a lot ofdifferent issues affecting them. So we want to carry this on to that eventually. But for the time being,we’re singularly focused. We are a non-partisan group because as Lauren pointed out, Franklin County is75% Republican and they all voted for Sarah Huckabee Sanders.

Our group has established and agreed that we all have different beliefs on incarceration and just how toaddress public safety in general. So that’s not what we’re going to argue about. We’re going to argue rightnow, we’re going to focus on the practicality of this location, the complete disregard for local input. Evenour legislators, they didn’t know. Our conservative legislators had no idea. Our county judges, our jps,nobody was told. So we want to focus on that transparency piece and giving us a voice in what’shappening in our own community as well as the taxpayer impact. Because we project that once this is allsaid and done, given the infrastructure needs and all of the extra requirements, that this will be upwards of$1.5 billion. So that’s not good for any Arkansas taxpayer. And just imagine how much you could do forrecidivism with that amount of money addressing pretrial services or just drug treatment and reentryprograms and that sort of thing.

So that’s where we are right now. We work through the legislature mostly. We work with our senators andrepresentatives in educating them just to say, Hey, this is how much it’s going to cost taxpayers. It doesn’thave to be this way. There are other solutions. There are other locations that are way more practical. Andthen most recently you bring in the federal argument because now it’s being considered as an ice detentionfacility. That’s a whole nother level of argument that we have to address. So just in, we just got togetherand decided, Hey, these are the steps we need to take. We had great advice from some other grassrootsorganizations that help people organize in Arkansas. And then we have some really, really good supportfrom our legislators that are working with us, the ones that are supportive of us.

Mansa Musa:

Unpack this for me because build this coalition that y’all got is a coalition of under any other givencircumstance, wouldn’t have nothing to do with each other. You got the sheriff, you got the farmers, yougot the churches, you got people that have a diverse way of thinking when it comes to social issues. Whatis it about this particular issue that y’all are able to get this coalition, and how are y’all able to maintain thecoalition? It is in fact the coalition that’s generating the opposition to the building of this mega

Natalie Cadena:

Well, I think we knew from the very beginning that this wasn’t political and it doesn’t need to be political.So we need to establish right away that we’re going to take help from anybody that’s going to give us helpin getting our voice out there. And of course, one of the first people to step up was Dr. Chris Jones, and hehad run for governor of Arkansas against Sarah Huckabee and lost, and now he’s running for Senatoragainst Tom Cotton. He was considered, I think, in the running for the Democratic Party chair of thenational delegation. So he’s an incredible man. He stepped up and said, Hey, what can I do? Just nothinghe could do really other than just help us get our message out. But he came in and spoke to us along withour conservative legislators, which was I think what the community needed to see.

They needed to see Democrat, Chris Jones standing next to Republican, Gary Stubblefield to know that,Hey, this is not an issue that needs to divide us. We’ve got a lot more in common. And I think this is, we’refinding out this is true on a lot of issues, but people had just checked out politics or they had just checkedout of government. They just think it runs itself. They vote once every four years and they’re done. So Ithink for us, it was just establishing that this is not going to be political. It’s not going to be Republican orDemocrat. It’s not going to be about any of that. This is about what’s right for local communities in ruralArkansas. And so we just kind of stay with that message and it brings people together no matter wherethey’re from.

Mansa Musa:

And Lauren, talk about how the land was purchased and was it any transparency associated with it? Andif it wasn’t, no transparency associated with it. How did your investigation unpack that?

Lauren Gill:

Yeah, so this story was honestly a reporter’s dream because the coalition had gone ahead and asked forpublic records, hundreds of pages of public records tracing how the state went about buying the land forthe prison, and then any conversations afterwards. And as they continued to procure various contracts andthings related to the prison sites. So yeah, I was given hundreds of pages of emails showing how the statehad 25,000 sites that met the criteria for what they were looking for, which was like 60 miles away fromother A DOC prisons had flat land and some available infrastructure as well as access to workforce. Soobviously those are all very vague things that they were looking for, but eventually the state narrows it to6,000. They visit 14, and then they find Franklin County through, it was listed on a rural land website inJuly, 2024, and an intern finds it, sends it to the person who is supposed to be in charge of finding theland, and then they kind of go from there by the end of the month, they’re in contract for the land, butdon’t announce it obviously until Halloween.

And then would later say at the town hall meeting that, well, we didn’t want to announce it because wewere afraid that there would be a bidding war for it, which raises a lot of questions since they’re already incontract for it. But yeah, that’s how they went about getting the land, which is 815 acres. When I wasdown there, I just kept hearing from people. They didn’t understand how there was going to be a 3000 bedprison built there because people would try to build fence posts or put in basic infrastructure, and it wouldtake them forever to just nail through the sandstone. That was all over Mill Creek Mountain, which is thearea that the prison’s being built in the surrounding area. So yeah, there’s a power line that runs throughthe property, but other than that, it’s extremely rural. You get to it by a very narrow two lane road. Andyeah, it’s just super rural. So it was definitely raising a lot of questions for me about how they plan tosupport not only the prisoners and staff, but family who are visiting other people who would be needed tosupport this prison in Franklin County.

Mansa Musa:

And Natalie, what’s the status of it now? What’s the current status of the prison plan and who’s still reallypushing for it, or is everybody opposed to it and where it staying at right now? As far as the prison plan?

Natalie

Original

Nebraska inmate punished for speaking on wife’s podcast

Nebraska inmate punished for speaking on wife’s podcast

Calling from a prison phone in Nebraska, Nicholas Ely joined his wife, Julie Montpetit, for an episode of Montpetit’s podcast, “More Than an Inmate’s Girlfriend,” which aims to destigmatize relationships like theirs. Afterwards, Montpetit lost all contact with her husband. Now, Ely is suing several employees in the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services, alleging that he has faced unlawful retaliation for appearing on the podcast and that his constitutional rights, including his right to free speech, were violated. In this episode of “Rattling the Bars,” host Mansa Musa speaks with Montpetit about losing contact with her husband and about the status of his lawsuit.

Credits:

Producer / Videographer / Post-Production: Cameron Granadino

Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

Mansa Musa:

Welcome to this edition of Rattling the Bars. I’m your host Mansa Musa. I remember when I was locked up in prison, one of the most celebrity cases that came out in Nebraska was Nebraska versus Greenho. And in Nebraska versus Greenho, it was a case that dealt specifically with parole. But when it dealt with parole, it dealt with mandatory language. In Nebraska, it said that if a person does A, B, C, D, E, F, G, they will be paroled. And so when a person came up to be paroled because they did A, B, C, D, E, F, G, the department of correction in Nebraska denied them parole. The Supreme Court ultimately waived in on say that this particular rule was law and therefore it was mandatory and had to force the Lord and person should

Original

Their kids were all killed by police. Now, they’re leading a movement

Their kids were all killed by police. Now, they’re leading a movement

In the USA, so many Black parents have seen their children killed by police that, now, growing numbers of those same parents are building a grassroots movement for accountability and justice. On Oct. 14—the birthday of George Floyd, who was murdered by Minneapolis police in 2020—a coalition of parents, allies, and community organizations gathered in Washington, DC, for a rally to remember those who have been killed by the police and to hear from their loved ones who continue to fight in their name. TRNN reports on the ground from the rally in Union Square.

Credits:Studio Production / Post Production: Cameron Granadino

Transcript
The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

Bianca Austin:

Every year when we celebrate George Floyd, we celebrate him because we in a movement. We going to keep this shit moving, y’all. Say his name! Say his name!

Rapper:

Stand up for your rights that had nothing at all,

beyond the scope, be hope to the people I sworn,

no matter the cost I let it be known…

Rev. Dr. Greta Willis:

But in the hearts of mothers as we in this remembrance, a celebration, a heavenly birthday for George Floyd. If you remember on that particular day, in those nine minutes and those 26 seconds, if I truly recall, that he was calling out for his mother, as he was calling out for his mother because he knew that the comfort was with his mother. As there are mothers that are here, mothers such as myself and the other mothers that’s a part of this particular party, this organization, a place that

Original